You can see exactly the Condor II is much wider than the Falcon, the general design solutions in both backpacks are the same, both have four compression straps with buckles on the sides and one at the top. Main compartment: Height 17.5 "(43.75 cm) x Width 14" (35 cm) x Depth 6.5 "(16.25 cm)įront upper pocket: Height 5.5 "(13.75 cm) x width 9" (22.5 cm) x Depth 2 "(5 cm)įront lower pocket: Height 8 "(20 cm) x width 9" (17.5 cm) x Depth 2.5 "(6.40 cm)īoth backpacks have a compartment for water bladder.Īt the beginning we have picture comparing those two with maxpedition EDC pocket organizer in OD green color. It makes most sense to begin the comparison with technical specifications and dimensions.īoth backpacks are made from 1000D balistic nylon ( dupont teflon coated ), YKK zips are used, and buckles ITW nexus This comparison took the form of photographs with descriptive brief conclusions.īartek uses his Condor II for shopping, work and travel since September 2008 while I have my Falcon II in the foliage green for about three weeks, but I uses it literally every day (shopping, school, long walks with the dog) and have already gained some experiences about it. ![]() ![]() Recently thanks to my colleague (Thanks to Bartek!) I Had the opportunity, to compare the title backpacks and exchange some experience with my colleague about them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |